English Edition English Edition
Current Issue Current Issue
Previous Issue Previous Issue
Next Issue Feedback
Readers Forum Readers Forum
Browse by Topic Browse by Topic
Participate Participate
Urdu Edition urdu Edition
Arabic Edition arabic Edition
 

 
 

Search

 
   
Editor's  shelf
   
STATE-BUILDING Governance and World Order in the 21st Century
   
Islam in the Era of Globalization: Muslim Attitudes towards Modernity and Identity.
   
Unholy Alliance
   
The Children of Abraham: Judaism, Christianity, Islam
   
Islam and the Challenge of Democracy
   

Islam Is... An Experience of Dialogue and Devotion

   
Hindutva Politics in India : Genesis, Political Strategies and Growth of Bharatiya Janata Party
   
Join Mailing List Join Our Mailing List
  As a subscriber, you will have full access to all of our Email Newsletters.
M. Amir
 

Home

 

Bro. Rashid Shaz:

Assalamu Alaikum.

I thank you for inviting me to submit articles for your web journal. I am honored. You already have many luminaries in your contact list. Let me begin with a few comments on your letter.

1. You are using derogatory language when you call some Saudi Ulama as "neo-Wahabi Ulemaa". I suggest that you drop the term Wahabi from your language. This is a derogatory term coined by the British in the 1820s to divide Indian Muslims and fight the Shahidain movement for driving out the British and defeating the Sikh tyranny in the Muslim majority areas of Punjab-Kashmir and parts of NWFP. They succeeded in defeating the movement and killing all fighters - it was done with the help of Muslims who believed the propaganda and definition provided by the British stooges among the Muslims of India. Since then the West has used the term numerous times for defeating Muslims by dividing them. I have extensively traveled the Muslim world and never met one person who calls himself "Wahabi". Now Americans are using the same term very successfully. By using this term you are aiding our enemies.

2. The war in Iraq is against Islam by the Americans and the West, but Muslim fighters in Iraq, in general, are not fighting for Islam but for Iraqi nationalism. However, War in Afghanistan is fought against and for Islam by the Americans and Afghanis, respectively. I, therefore, do not label war in Iraq as a Jihad but the war in Afghanistan is Jihad. In a general sense of the word meaning of struggle, both wars are jihad. Please translate the word Jihad meaning "holy war" as no war is holy but some wars are inevitable and justifiable.

3. A true struggle for freedom never fails, however sometimes the result is delayed. I do not believe that the struggle by the Iraqis and Afghanis will fail because their sincerity will be rewarded by Allah. If they are fighting for money or power for themselves then the result could be disastrous because Allah's help will not be there.

4. Ummah is not at "dead end." Every struggle has maturing phase that is, the initial phase of learning through errors. Muslims are in this stage. If we hold on to the Qur'an and Sunnah (see Qur'an 3:103) we will surely be victorious. Prophet Muhammad himself went through such stages (see the Qur'an 8:65-66).

Wassalam.

Dr. M. Amir Ali
Institute of Islamic Information and Education
amirali@ilaam.net

Home


Printer-Friendly Version Tell a friend Add to Favorites Comments
 
Copyright 2004. Future Islam, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy